NEW PARADIGM METAPHYSICS
New Paradigm Metaphysics explores the interconnectedness of quantum liminality, patterning, syntony, and coherence, offering a multidimensional framework for understanding transformative dynamics across the electromagnetic spectrum. This research broadens scientific paradigms, reconceptualizing life and intelligence beyond biology and cognition, echoing the insights of pioneers like Nikola Tesla and Walter Russell.
LIMINALITY AND EMERGENCE
Investigation of the dynamic interplay between quantum principles and liminal phase-shifts, exploration of how transitions between different states of consciousness resonate with principles such as superposition, entanglement, and coherence. Research in this area delves into the dynamics underlying syntony, involving harmonic resonance, intentional consonance, and evolutionary coherence between individuals, groups, or systems during liminal state transitions, and examines how quantum principles manifest in the emergence of coherent patterns and behaviors within complex systems.
PATTERNING AND COHERENCE
Exploration of the role of patterning — including frequency, rhythm, and spatial materiality — in describing and shaping the coherence dynamics of human experience and culture, investigating how recurring patterns, archetypes, and structures contribute to the sense of coherence and meaning-making during liminal transitions. Research in this area seeks to identify and analyze the underlying patterns that emerge across diverse contexts and scales, elucidating their role in facilitating integration, co-emergence, and holistic understanding within individual and collective consciousness.
Current Research Projects
Insights as a Mechanism of Non-Local Knowledge Transfer:
The Role of Spirituality in Scientific Discoveries and Simultaneous Inventions within a Dual-Paradigm Framework
LINPR Research Project Summary
By Mel Larrosa
27 May 2025
Insights are widely recognized as a cognitive phenomenon marked by the sudden realization of a solution through the reorganization of previously held information into a coherent whole (Kounios & Beeman, 2009). While neuroscience has identified strong correlates of insight, such as modulation of the default mode network and specific gamma-band activity (Jung-Beeman, 2004), dopaminergic activation and anterior cingulate cortex involvement (Subramaniam, 2009), no definitive causal mechanism has been experimentally established under materialist frameworks. Moreover, despite its wide acceptance, the prevailing assumption that insights merely recombine existing memories remains unproven. Consequently, further investigation is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of the universally experienced phenomenon of insights.
This project seeks to investigate scientific insights, rather than being produced exclusively by internal brain-based processes, as emerging from transpersonal informational structures via Informational Fields, such as the Akashic Field (Laszlo, 2004), and others (Higher-Dimensional Consciousness – Carr, 2008; Morphic Resonance – Sheldrake, 1981; Implicate Order – Bohm, 1980; and Meaning Fields – Baruss, 2018).
Drawing from post-materialist theories, this hypothesis posits that insights arise at the intersection of personal relevance and transpersonal informational structures. Grounded in a post-materialist paradigm of consciousness, this project aims to assess whether insights of researchers can be predictive of their scientific discoveries and whether their origin could be nonlocal in nature.
In this context, this project will also explore the role of spiritual and religious practices, based on growing evidence that such practices alter states of consciousness in ways that may enhance intuitive access to nonlocal informational fields (Newberg & Iversen, 2003). Such practices could act as catalysts, facilitating cognitive resonance with Informational Fields and potentially influencing both the frequency and depth of insights. Spiritual and Religious practices, therefore, will be examined as a potential moderating or mediating variable in how non-local knowledge is accessed and applied during the scientific discovery process. This project will empirically examine whether individuals with greater spiritual engagement have more frequent or impactful insights, and whether this correlates with measurable scientific productivity.
To help distinguish the potential involvement of non-local Informational Fields in the occurrence and conversion of insights into scientific discoveries, this study will specifically analyze a subtype of scientific discovery known as simultaneous invention. These are independent, near-simultaneous breakthroughs
made by researchers without clearly shared technological or knowledge backgrounds and may serve as strong indicators of independent access to a shared informational field, beyond the explanatory scope of materialist frameworks. Historical and contemporaneous examples of simultaneous inventions suggest patterns that may not be adequately explained by cultural or historical coincidences alone.
By integrating perspectives from neuroscience, consciousness studies, psychology, and the philosophy of science, this project aims to contribute both empirical evidence and theoretical advancement. It will provide new understanding into how knowledge is generated, how insights and creativity function, and how informational fields may operate in the context of scientific innovation.
Jung-Beeman, M., et al. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biology, 2(4), e97.
Barušs, I. (2018). Meaning fields: Meaning beyond the human as a resolution of boundary problems introduced by nonlocality. EdgeScience, 35, 8–11.
Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge.
Carr, B. J. (2008). Universe or multiverse? Cambridge University Press.
Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2009). The Aha! moment: The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(4), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01638.x
Laszlo, E. (2004). Science and the Akashic field: An integral theory of everything. Inner Traditions.
Newberg, A. B., & Iversen, J. (2003). The neural basis of the complex mental task of meditation: neurotransmitter and neurochemical considerations. Medical Hypotheses, 61(2), 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9877(03)00175-0
Sheldrake, R. (1981). A new science of life: The hypothesis of formative causation. Blond & Briggs.
Subramaniam, K., Kounios, J., Parrish, T. B., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2009). A brain mechanism for facilitation of insight by positive affect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(3), 415–432.